Site icon RunSensible

Belgium

The legal framework for eSignatures in Belgium is largely based on both EU regulations and national law. The key regulation governing eSignatures across the EU, including Belgium, is the eIDAS Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 910/2014). This regulation sets the standard for electronic identification, authentication, and trust services within the European Union.

Understanding E-Signature Laws in Belgium

Understanding e-signature laws in Belgium involves navigating both European Union (EU) regulations and Belgian national law. The legal framework for e-signatures in Belgium ensures the recognition and use of electronic signatures for various transactions while clarifying their legal validity, enforceability, and security standards.

The Belgian Civil Code supports using electronic signatures in various legal and business contexts, provided they meet the conditions of authenticity, integrity, and non-repudiation. Article 1322 of the Civil Code, which was amended to align with eIDAS, affirms that e-signatures can have the same legal value as handwritten signatures when the following are ensured:

E-signatures are admissible as evidence in Belgian courts. However, the type of signature used influences the level of proof required:

Belgium recognizes qualified trust service providers (QTSPs) that issue certificates for Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES). These providers are regulated and must comply with strict EU standards to ensure the authenticity and security of electronic transactions. Some QTSPs operating in Belgium include GlobalSign and Zetes, both of which provide services like digital signatures and identity verification.

Belgian e-signature law also aligns with GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) in protecting personal data in electronic transactions.

Use Cases for eSignatures in Belgium

E-signatures are widely used in Belgium for:

Exclusions in E-Signature Usage under Belgium Law

E-signatures are broadly accepted in Belgium for a wide variety of business, legal, and governmental transactions; however, certain high-stakes or formal legal processes still require handwritten signatures.

Seminal Case

Attorney General at the Court of Appeal of Ghent v M A, 4 februari 2020 P.19.1086.N, Hof van Cassatie, tweede kamer

Exit mobile version